Over the years, I’ve come across so many Ansel Adams wannabes, Wynn Bullock wannabes, Michael Kenna wannabes and many others who’d prefer to be someone other than who they are. I’ve been drawn to the conclusion that imitation is the sincerest form of mindlessness.
I’ve managed to escape that. Though I admire the work of many artists in many media, I have neither icons nor mentors. My first art teacher was an idiot, and this did me sterling service. I was left on my own to pursue work as I wished, and as I could invent. And invent I did, drawing often from a long classical education, from a passion for literature and music, history and philosophy, as well as unorthodoxy, bloodymindedness, and a capacity to find joy in small phenomena that often escape the notice of others. As digital media have thinned the walls among art forms, so has my education blossomed.
From time to time I’ve been asked “How did you do that?” That’s actually an inquiry that tends to yield much less useful information than “Why did you do that?” The former is entirely mechanistic and limited, while the latter is considerably more thoughtful, more probing, more metaphysical, more likely to result in independent effort, and always much better teaching than requiring students to use carbon paper.
However, on this one occasion, I’d like to indulge those who ask the first question. Below, I include an image made from my love of the season, and below that, the recipe for achieving it. Its title is Autumn Colors.
Take ten French colored pencils, a can of Gillette aerosol shaving cream, and a single autumn leaf. Mix the ingredients carefully until you find the right flavor, testing frequently. Using a trustworthy camera, add a pinch of powdered Photoshop, and a heaped tablespoon of imagination. Store for several nights in the occipital lobe, and when it has risen sufficiently, place in a warm monitor. Results may vary.
Pulitzer-Prizewinning novelist Jhumpa Lahiri, in her book In Other Words, writes of the great difficulty, as a mature adult, in acquiring a new language, in her case, Italian. She describes the years of study, the discipline, practice, receptiveness, imagination and devotion, and then adds an essential ingredient: “I renounce expertise to challenge myself. I trade certainty for uncertainty.” That’s the price and the intrinsic reward for learning a new language, or a new voice in an art medium, and continuing to refine the process, and, in the refining, changing direction, seeking refreshment.
There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with seeing the world through the eyes of others. After all, a lot of teaching and learning happens that way. But there is much to be said for also seeing the world through one’s own eyes.
What’s the point of standing upon the shoulders of giants if your only vision is downward?
_________________________________________________________
© Raphael Shevelev. All Rights Reserved. Permission to reprint is granted provided the article, copyright and byline are printed intact, with all links visible and made live if distributed in electronic form.
Raphael Shevelev is a California based fine art photographer, digital artist and writer on photography and the creative process. He is known for the wide and experimental range of his art, and an aesthetic that emphasizes strong design, metaphor and story. His photographic images can be seen and purchased at www.raphaelshevelev.com/galleries
Author: webadmin
-
The Sincerest Form
-
Seeking Inspiration and Finding It
I see a great number of images. I make a few myself, and I subscribe to remarkable journals put out by the Royal Photographic Society of Great Britain, LensWork, others devoted to the image, and those made by many artists, some of whom I know. I see works exhibited in museums, galleries and websites all over the world. The work is stunning. The variety is as great as the huge population in pursuit of this calling, and the ingenuity of many of the images is almost beyond belief. I can’t think of a finer way of getting my daily inspiration, not to plagiarize, but to aspire. It is impossible to be a writer without being a reader. It’s just as impossible to be an artist without voraciously consuming art.
I have something in common with Georg Friedrich Handel and Wynn Bullock, probably many hundreds, perhaps thousands of others. Handel, born in 1685, the same year as Johann Sebastian Bach, was consumed with music. His father, Georg Sr., banned musical instruments from the house and insisted that his son study a respectable profession, law. Wynn Bullock’s mother was the first female Superior Court judge in California. Wynn was pressed to attend law school, but abandoned his books on his classroom desk and fled to art school.
My elementary school art teacher gave each student a lump of clay, and ordered us to copy a small horse sculpture on a shelf in the back of the room. I suppose even then at the age of 10 or so, I had acquired a nonconformist, surrealist gene. My horse had shorter front legs so he wouldn’t have to bend as far for his food, something I’ve always thought important; and longer rear legs so he could propel himself with great speed. Shading into marsupial. Mr. Strever was so annoyed with my unnatural equine re-creation that he smashed it with his fist and said “You’ll never understand anything about art.” I’ve since learned to disagree.
My father, like Herr Handel’s attitude to his son, was horrified by my interest in art, cut off access to supplies, and insisted I attend law school. It was a sympathetic Dean, a family acquaintance, who got me off the hook. I compromised by becoming an academic political scientist. The social status suited my father, though emphatically not my political analyses. It was years after my father’s death that I felt the freedom to pursue this career of art and writing, strongly supported by my brilliant wife’s encouragement. I was far along in my forties when it all began in earnest. Needing to learn quickly, I decided to teach. I can’t imagine another way of accelerating the process. So I reached for some native chutzpah, and talked my way into lecturing in arts organizations and colleges. I have loved every moment, and almost certainly learned more than my students, to whom I remain grateful.
Inspiration comes from many sources, experience, learning, relationships, and for me, perhaps above all, music, the Empress of all the arts. Each day I conduct some of the world’s great orchestras. This morning I led the Bavarian State Radio Orchestra in a particularly beautiful rendition (if I may say so) of Mozart’s Requiem from my podium, the saddle of my stationary exercise bike.
Many people have expressed their views of what constitutes a creative life. Most recently, Brooks Jensen, Editor/Publisher of LensWork, recorded a podcast on this subject. It is worth the listening:
Two years ago, an internationally renowned constitutional lawyer, whom I first encountered when she was the infant daughter of one of my own professors, was at my home for dinner. We had decades to catch up on. During our conversation, she said, “You would have made a fine lawyer.”
I wish she hadn’t said that!
_________________________________________________________
© Raphael Shevelev. All Rights Reserved. Permission to reprint is granted provided the article, copyright and byline are printed intact, with all links visible and made live if distributed in electronic form.
Raphael Shevelev is a California based fine art photographer, digital artist and writer on photography and the creative process. He is known for the wide and experimental range of his art, and an aesthetic that emphasizes strong design, metaphor and story. His photographic images can be seen and purchased at www.raphaelshevelev.com/galleries -
The Mechanical Fetish
A friend who is a fine, accomplished and well-published poet recently stopped by. She looked at one of the pictures on the dining room wall and said “Photoshop?” I said “Cerebrum.” Then I asked her what word processor she used to compose her poems. From her chastened look, I gathered the message had leaked through.
I continue to be dismayed at how many photography publications request, and print, details of photographers’ equipment. Yet, I don’t see literary magazines demanding and revealing the kind of pens, pencils, typewriters, paper, computers, printers, word processing programs used by their authors.
What is this fetish with mechanics all about?
I think it is largely fueled by asking the delusional, wrong question: “How did you do this (so I can replicate your steps and show off my creativity?)” The right question might be “Why did you do this?” and other variations of inquiry about observation, interpretation, philosophy, mentation. I’ve been writing and lecturing about this for decades, but that’s a hint that the message hasn’t yet gone viral!
Even the world’s oldest continuous photographic publication, the Journal of the Royal Photographic Society of Great Britain, does this. When examining a photograph do I really give a laxative about which camera, lens or tripod was used?
A few months ago, the educated, cultured, and very personable Editor of the Journal called from Glasgow to interview me at some length on my portfolio Light and Recovery. Next month, the September issue will carry some of that work. We talked of the many, many things that go into making a portfolio of images and text, not the least of it being the intensely personal history and emotions involved.
Then, at the end of the call, she asked “What kind of equipment did you use?” I responded “Mostly my brain. Does that make me different?” Other than saturated cultural conditioning, there may have been practical, subtle, even entirely unconscious reasons for the question. The Journal carries quite a few advertisements from manufacturers and retailers, and I am aware of how vitally important that support is for a non-profit organization, known in the U.K. as a “charity.”
Less than a year ago I prevailed upon the Director-General of the Royal Photographic to terminate the Society’s common practice of limiting entries to exhibitions and competitions on the basis of when the image was made. I did this for two principal reasons: unless dealing with the scholarship of especially precious, unique, or antique photographs, aesthetics should be the primary issue, not provenance; and because of technological innovation, a photograph can easily evolve and become a combination of several images made at different times. I’ve changed or added to photographs that first began their life on film more than thirty years ago. The Society used to request information on where the photographs were made, which makes not much more sense. Mine are commonly made north of my neck and in the region of our planet, though there are exceptions.
I originally arrived from outer space, you know.
My first published photograph, a monochrome picture of runners at a high school track event, made it into a newspaper in Cape Town when I was a teenager. Even then I resisted numerical reductionism. When an editor insisted, I wrote 1/10,000 of a second at f64. I was astonished when they printed that. It didn’t have to make sense.
In previous lectures and publications I have talked about the analogy of teaching cooking by emphasizing organic ingredients, nutrition, health, presentation and sensual delight, without spending much time on the structure of a stove.
Recently I came across a short, pithy, and pointed article by Texas artist Jann Alexander “How to talk to a photographer like she’s an artist.” It’s a good read from a good artist. It must be good: she thinks the way I do.
At a reception in San Francisco some years ago, a senior Indian diplomat told me that the essence of photography is the direction in which you point the camera. He might have added that the essence of literature is in the choice of words. As a student and former professor of international relations, a similar riposte about diplomacy sprinted into my mind. Uncharacteristically, I was diplomatic enough to smile and keep my thoughts where my photography dwells: in my brain. But I confess that I took great comfort from the then-unexpressed thought that I knew much more about diplomacy than he did about photography.
As to equipment, I once insisted to a magazine editor that I wouldn’t reveal the brand of camera I used until Nikon paid me for the advertisement.
_________________________________________________________
© Raphael Shevelev. All Rights Reserved. Permission to reprint is granted provided the article, copyright and byline are printed intact, with all links visible and made live if distributed in electronic form.
Raphael Shevelev is a California based fine art photographer, digital artist and writer on photography and the creative process. He is known for the wide and experimental range of his art, and an aesthetic that emphasizes strong design, metaphor and story. His photographic images can be seen and purchased at www.raphaelshevelev.com/galleries